Re: [NTG-context] AMSTeX compatibility: `\dotsb` is not defined

2011-05-09 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4-5-2011 12:52, Paul Menzel wrote: I think the question is the following. Does ConTeXt want to define all commands amstex/amsmath defines? You need to convince Aditya then as he has to make up that list. I think that ConTeXt should be feature

Re: [NTG-context] AMSTeX compatibility: `\dotsb` is not defined

2011-05-09 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Montag, den 09.05.2011, 16:47 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: On Wed, 4 May 2011, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4-5-2011 12:52, Paul Menzel wrote: I think the question is the following. Does ConTeXt want to define all commands amstex/amsmath defines? You need to convince Aditya then as he

Re: [NTG-context] AMSTeX compatibility: `\dotsb` is not defined

2011-05-09 Thread Hans Hagen
On 9-5-2011 11:13, Paul Menzel wrote: If so, we can add an option to \setupmathematics or a dedicated \setupdots (or something similar) command. That sounds like a feasible solution. I have no clue what dotsb is supposed to to so it's up to Aditya to provide it. Hans

Re: [NTG-context] AMSTeX compatibility: `\dotsb` is not defined

2011-05-04 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Dienstag, den 03.05.2011, 22:25 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: Am 03.05.2011 um 15:46 schrieb Paul Menzel: `\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1]. Why don’t you use \cdots, i can see no difference between your linked example and mine below

Re: [NTG-context] AMSTeX compatibility: `\dotsb` is not defined

2011-05-04 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Dienstag, den 03.05.2011, 23:54 -0400 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: On Tue, 3 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote: `\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1]. Is `\dotsb` not defined intentionally? I do not completely understand why this command is needed. I think

Re: [NTG-context] AMSTeX compatibility: `\dotsb` is not defined

2011-05-04 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4-5-2011 12:52, Paul Menzel wrote: I think the question is the following. Does ConTeXt want to define all commands amstex/amsmath defines? You need to convince Aditya then as he has to make up that list. Hans

[NTG-context] AMSTeX compatibility: `\dotsb` is not defined

2011-05-03 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear ConTeXt folks, `\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1]. Please find the following minimal example also attached. \starttext This throws an error, since »\backslash dotsb« is not defined. \startformula 1 + 2

Re: [NTG-context] AMSTeX compatibility: `\dotsb` is not defined

2011-05-03 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 03.05.2011 um 15:46 schrieb Paul Menzel: Dear ConTeXt folks, `\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1]. Why don’t you use \cdots, i can see no difference between your linked example and mine below. \setupbodyfont[pagella] \starttext \formula{A_1+\cdots

Re: [NTG-context] AMSTeX compatibility: `\dotsb` is not defined

2011-05-03 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote: Dear ConTeXt folks, `\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1]. Is `\dotsb` not defined intentionally? I do not completely understand why this command is needed. I think that the intent of amstex is that the user should